From 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of
producer
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 13d945c0d03f..1b28df2d9104 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
} else
--
GitLab