Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 0326f227 authored by Kuniyuki Iwashima's avatar Kuniyuki Iwashima Committed by Yongqiang Liu
Browse files

net: Fix data-races around netdev_tstamp_prequeue.

stable inclusion
from stable-v4.19.257
commit 8121bda0093a1e4ad517d93a5707e2a5615c6f99
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5UQH4


CVE: NA

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 61adf447e38664447526698872e21c04623afb8e ]

While reading netdev_tstamp_prequeue, it can be changed concurrently.
Thus, we need to add READ_ONCE() to its readers.

Fixes: 3b098e2d ("net: Consistent skb timestamping")
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>
parent 5088437d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -4473,7 +4473,7 @@ static int netif_rx_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int ret;
net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
net_timestamp_check(READ_ONCE(netdev_tstamp_prequeue), skb);
trace_netif_rx(skb);
......@@ -4793,7 +4793,7 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
__be16 type;
net_timestamp_check(!netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
net_timestamp_check(!READ_ONCE(netdev_tstamp_prequeue), skb);
trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
......@@ -5145,7 +5145,7 @@ static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int ret;
net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
net_timestamp_check(READ_ONCE(netdev_tstamp_prequeue), skb);
if (skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
......@@ -5175,7 +5175,7 @@ static void netif_receive_skb_list_internal(struct list_head *head)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sublist);
list_for_each_entry_safe(skb, next, head, list) {
net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
net_timestamp_check(READ_ONCE(netdev_tstamp_prequeue), skb);
skb_list_del_init(skb);
if (!skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
list_add_tail(&skb->list, &sublist);
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment