Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 3bf49a0c authored by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo's avatar Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Committed by Yang Yingliang
Browse files

can: bcm: delay release of struct bcm_op after synchronize_rcu()

mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.14-rc1
commit d5f9023fa61ee8b94f37a93f08e94b136cf1e463
category: bugfix
bugzilla: NA
CVE: CVE-2021-3609

--------------------------------

can_rx_register() callbacks may be called concurrently to the call to
can_rx_unregister(). The callbacks and callback data, though, are
protected by RCU and the struct sock reference count.

So the callback data is really attached to the life of sk, meaning
that it should be released on sk_destruct. However, bcm_remove_op()
calls tasklet_kill(), and RCU callbacks may be called under RCU
softirq, so that cannot be used on kernels before the introduction of
HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT.

However, bcm_rx_handler() is called under RCU protection, so after
calling can_rx_unregister(), we may call synchronize_rcu() in order to
wait for any RCU read-side critical sections to finish. That is,
bcm_rx_handler() won't be called anymore for those ops. So, we only
free them, after we do that synchronize_rcu().

Fixes: ffd980f9 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210619161813.2098382-1-cascardo@canonical.com


Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatar <syzbot+0f7e7e5e2f4f40fa89c0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarNorbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarOliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarXiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarYue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
parent 7e2bfaf5
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ static int bcm_delete_rx_op(struct list_head *ops, struct bcm_msg_head *mh,
bcm_rx_handler, op);
list_del(&op->list);
synchronize_rcu();
bcm_remove_op(op);
return 1; /* done */
}
......@@ -1557,9 +1558,13 @@ static int bcm_release(struct socket *sock)
REGMASK(op->can_id),
bcm_rx_handler, op);
bcm_remove_op(op);
}
synchronize_rcu();
list_for_each_entry_safe(op, next, &bo->rx_ops, list)
bcm_remove_op(op);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
/* remove procfs entry */
if (net->can.bcmproc_dir && bo->bcm_proc_read)
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment