Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6c801387 authored by Xin Long's avatar Xin Long Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

sctp: process duplicated strreset asoc request correctly


This patch is to fix the replay attack issue for strreset asoc requests.

When a duplicated strreset asoc request is received, reply it with bad
seqno if it's seqno < asoc->strreset_inseq - 2, and reply it with the
result saved in asoc if it's seqno >= asoc->strreset_inseq - 2.

But note that if the result saved in asoc is performed, the sender's next
tsn and receiver's next tsn for the response chunk should be set. It's
safe to get them from asoc. Because if it's changed, which means the peer
has received the response already, the new response with wrong tsn won't
be accepted by peer.

Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d0f025e6
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -529,12 +529,21 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_process_strreset_tsnreq(
__u16 i;
request_seq = ntohl(tsnreq->request_seq);
if (request_seq > asoc->strreset_inseq) {
if (TSN_lt(asoc->strreset_inseq, request_seq) ||
TSN_lt(request_seq, asoc->strreset_inseq - 2)) {
result = SCTP_STRRESET_ERR_BAD_SEQNO;
goto out;
} else if (request_seq == asoc->strreset_inseq) {
asoc->strreset_inseq++;
goto err;
} else if (TSN_lt(request_seq, asoc->strreset_inseq)) {
i = asoc->strreset_inseq - request_seq - 1;
result = asoc->strreset_result[i];
if (result == SCTP_STRRESET_PERFORMED) {
next_tsn = asoc->next_tsn;
init_tsn =
sctp_tsnmap_get_ctsn(&asoc->peer.tsn_map) + 1;
}
goto err;
}
asoc->strreset_inseq++;
if (!(asoc->strreset_enable & SCTP_ENABLE_RESET_ASSOC_REQ))
goto out;
......@@ -591,6 +600,8 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_process_strreset_tsnreq(
next_tsn, GFP_ATOMIC);
out:
sctp_update_strreset_result(asoc, result);
err:
return sctp_make_strreset_tsnresp(asoc, result, request_seq,
next_tsn, init_tsn);
}
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment